Monday, June 6, 2022

FAZENDA TANGARÁ DA BOCAINAf

 

Fotos e Vídeos do Local

                                                      













       (3) Folheto de Venda em Português e em Inglês


 

FOTOS COMPLEMENTARES

             










Friday, June 3, 2022

TRUMP THROWS A TRUTH BOMB AT GUM - CONTROL

https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=570804277953947

A COUNTRY PERPLEXED WITH ITSELF
https://palacazgrandesartigos(.blogspot.)com/2016/01/ii-country-perplex-with-itself-em.html
  • Paulo Augusto Lacaz
    EXPLANATION ON THEOLOGICAL RELIGIOUS CONFLICT + CHILDREN'S FEELINGS EDUCATION, IN SUBORDINATING EGOISM UNDER ALTRUISM https://palacazgrandesartigos(.blogspot.)com/2022/06/explanation-on-theological-religious.html
    • Curtir
    • Responder
    • 2 h
    • Editado
    • Paulo Augusto Lacaz
      WE WILL HAVE TO IMPROVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RELIGIONS. http://sccbesme-humanidade(.blogspot.)com/2012/07/responsabilidade-das-religioes.html



EXPLANATION ON THEOLOGICAL RELIGIOUS CONFLICT + CHILDREN'S FEELINGS EDUCATION, IN SUBORDINATING EGOISM TO ALTRUISM.

THE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN GOD "OPEN THEIR SOULS OR MINDS OR Psyche", or rather, SUBJECTIVELY DEVELOP IDEAS, WHICH RESULT IN THOUGHTS, WHERE ARBITRARILY RULES - OPINION THAT IS NOT BACKED BY A SCIENTIFIC DOCTRINE.

THUS CONFLICT OCCURS.

AS THEY HAVE NO WAY TO ARGUE, IT APPEALS TO VIOLENCE; VERBAL, WRITTEN, OR PHYSICAL.

THEREFORE BOTH THE CATHOLICS AND THE PROTESTANTS - AND THE MUSLIMS; THE JEWS AND THE PALESTINIANS AND THE CATHOLICS - IN JUDAISM IN CATHOLICISM, WITH THE MOMMY-ANS LIVE IN CONFLICT; BECAUSE THE STRUGGLES BETWEEN ABSOLUTE DOCTRINES, WHOSE DOGMAS ARE NOT SCIENTIFICALLY DEMONSTRATED, walk towards the only way to make one doctrine prevail over the other, with regard to its principles or laws, and it is through violence - the aggressiveness of one over the other arises. OTHER.

AT THIS MOMENT WE ARE WITH THE PROTESTS OF VARIOUS SECTS IN RELIGIOUS NEO LIBERALISM - FREE WILL -

AS THE BIBLE IS A VACANT BOOK, IT ALLOWS PEOPLE TO HAVE THE CONDITION TO INTERPRET IT IN THEIR WAY, CREATING A SERIES OF DOCTRINAL FOLLOWINGS.

THIS PANORAMA CONSECRATES TO THE MODERN/CONTEMPORARY MOVEMENT TO A DISPROPORTIONATE EXTENT TO ITS HISTORICAL VALUE, EVEN REGARDING THESE 5 CENTURIES; TODAY THERE ARE MORE THAN 6 WHERE CONCRETE WORSHIP CAN NOT HONOR THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE WESTERN, ACCORDING TO THE RESPECTIVE VALUE OF EACH ONE;

BECAUSE SIMILAR REPRESENTATION ONLY EMBRACES; IT ONLY CONSECRATES INTELLIGENCE AND ACTIVITY WITHOUT BEING DIRECTLY ABLE TO ADMIT CONTROL OF EGOISTIC FEELINGS (7) IN ITS SUBORDINATION TO THE THREE ALTRUISTIC FEELINGS.

WE WILL HAVE TO IMPROVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RELIGIONS.   http://sccbesme-humanidade.blogspot.com/2012/07/responsabilidade-das-religioes.html

P.A.LACAZ

 

e.blogspot.com/2012/07/responsabilidade-das-religioes.html

Thursday, June 2, 2022

The Economist this week JUNE 2ND 2022

 


JUNE 2ND 2022

The Economist this week

Highlights from the latest issue

The Economist

Vladimir Putin launched his invasion of Ukraine 100 days ago by threatening countries tempted to interfere with consequences “such as you have never seen in your entire history”. Russian television has since tantalised viewers with chit-chat about nuclear Armageddon. 
 
The moral revulsion that restrains the use of nuclear weapons has been weakening. Weapons are proliferating. As memories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki fade, there is insufficient alarm at the prospect of how hard it will be to keep the peace if many states have a bomb. The invasion of Ukraine adds to this malaise. Russia is unlikely to use a nuclear weapon in Ukraine. But Mr Putin’s threat has prompted NATO to limit the support it is prepared to offer the government in Kyiv. Some have warned that inflicting a defeat on Russia could back its president into a corner with devastating consequences.
 
One implication of this is that vulnerable states that see the world through Ukraine’s eyes may feel that the best defence against a nuclear-armed aggressor is to have weapons of their own. The other is that nuclear-armed states may believe that they can gain by copying Mr Putin’s tactics. One day someone somewhere will surely turn their threat into reality. That must not be this war’s devastating legacy.


Zanny Minton Beddoes
Editor-in-chief

Navigate the global landscape

Subscribe today with 50% off your first year. Cancel at any time

Subscribe
 

Editor’s picks

Must-reads from the current edition

Image article 1

Image article 2

Image article 3

Image article 4

Image article 5

Image article 6

Image article 7

The world this week

Russian forces captured parts of Severodonetsk, a town in Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region. Some Ukrainian defenders were holding on, but many of the 10,000 thought to have been stationed there retreated. Russian troops have been advancing slowly in the east of the country, assisted by heavy artillery.

America said it would send more weapons to Ukraine, including long-range rocket launchers that will help the country’s defenders shoot back at the Russian artillery pounding their positions in the east. The Pentagon is supplying the new kit on condition that it not be used to strike targets in Russia. President Joe Biden reiterated that America does not seek war with Russia, and does not aim to oust Vladimir Putin, Russia’s president.

More from Politics this week

The euro zone’s annual inflation rate leapt to 8.1% in May. The European Central Bank is expected to raise interest rates for the first time in a decade in July and again in September. Surging prices may mean that it will opt for bolder increases than currently envisaged, perhaps of half a percentage point.

More from Business this week

See full edition →

In case you missed it

One of our most popular stories from the past seven days

Image article 8

From Economist Films


Also from The Economist



We'd like to hear from you.    

Share your feedback or send us an email below to get in touch.

arrow Email newsletters@economist.com

arrow Share your feedback

 

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.