We must move on from neoliberalism in the post-COVID era

We must move on from neoliberalism in the post-COVID era  https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/10/coronavirus-covid19-recovery-capitalism-environment-economics-equality?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social_scheduler&utm_term=COVID-19&utm_content=13/10/2020+11:00&fbclid=IwAR2FulRKkEYpYWtguehQYgpjmxz8slG6tEY_TPK5ZqBGiVaMYjnjqa8RBXQ

Dear Mr. Klaus Schwab, I would appreciate very much, if you have conditions to analyze my new idea, to save Capitalism, which defends the Merit (Capacity, Capability, and Altruism), in a more distributive way of gaining wealth, avoiding misery and concentration of income in a few millionaires.

But for it happens that this is necessary for a NEW POLITICAL REGIME.

I suggest the REPUBLICAN SOCIETOCRATIC, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJbz7uopU3GQdaRD7AM1M1g

with Freedom of Democratic Expression - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsmpLllrdWs, modifying the State Structure and Conjuncture, the new Election System, and the form of Nomination of Candidates, from Judiciary, from Legislative and Executive.

Some Important Notes

Why does one Agency legislate for another to execute? The executive's hypertrophy is so natural that in most cases Congress never contradicted the President of the Republic, except exceptionally. But in a system of Democratic Political Regime, formed by a corrupt majority, anything is possible - impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff.

Given the absence of the Rewiring of Moral and Social good and/or Political Doctrine to form public opinion and guide the conduct of government officials, they are actually forced to make personal decisions whether they are monocratic or parliamentary.

To legitimize power, they invented popular sovereignty, manifested by-election, to replace aristocratic heredity. 

Now, the electoral process is based on two big lies. 

First of all, the votes are the same, both for the well-intentioned and the interested, for the competent and for the incompetent. 

Second, most are right, when, in general, they are not. If the number of voters increases, the moral and intellectual level will drop. 

Basically, the election is just an illusion, since the people do not choose anyone, at most, decide among candidates presented by the most active groups. The current legitimacy of the government results from the strength it represents, therefore, society is a collective being, but that only acts through individual bodies.  http://www.doutrinadahumanidade.com/artigos/democracia_e_societocracia.htm

As for succession, the rule of temporality is illogical. Administrative continuity makes it possible to improve the exercise of public affairs and removes vulgar and unbridled ambitions. It is enough to establish limits of maximum and minimum age, 35 to 70 years, for example: If the entrepreneurs and the directors of religious, cultural, and private institutions, remain in the posts while they have the strength to exercise them, for better efficiency.

Why should government officials change periodically?

As for succession, the rule of temporality is illogical. Administrative continuity makes it possible to improve the exercise of public affairs and removes vulgar and unbridled ambitions. It is enough to establish limits of maximum and minimum age, 35 to 70 years, for example: If the entrepreneurs and the directors of religious, cultural, and private institutions, remain in the posts while they have the strength to exercise them, for better efficiency.

Why should government officials change periodically?

In the case of a permanent replacement, it is best for the governor to indicate the successor, provided that he cannot appoint relatives. Nobody thinks he is more qualified for this. The great statesman Bolívar, whose 2nd centenary of birth was celebrated in 1983, stated that "A president for life with the faculty and electing his successor constitutes the most sublime inspiration in the republican order". He indicates the successor and he is only accepted if 85% of his second and third in the government hierarchy, accept.

5000/5000

Limite de caracteres: 5000TRADUZIR OS PRÓXIMOS 5000