Trump says he shouldn't have left the White House
Donald J Trump is a Republican Speaker.
In Ancient Rome, when Chaos was prevailing, The Senate Appointed a Dictator, Who Was Neither a Despot Nor Tyrannical, for 6 months. EVERYONE OBEYED; The Temporarily Rule is illogical.
As for democracy, metaphysical regime, Aristotle, prince of philosophers, preferred an elite government and did not like democracy, for tending to a tyranny of the majority, formed by the lower classes (education / instruction / culture - and low economic power) , who oppressed the superior layers of society and did not respect the general principles of liberal coexistence and, nowadays, due to the lying formation of the elite, which covered the people, making democracy a tyrannical dictatorship of numbers.
It is also worth warning that parlamentarism is a regime suitable for England and presidentialism to the peoples of the European continent, and their persecutors from an overseas, especially the Latinos, who are less disciplined.
The parliamentary system has no stability: absence of government and irresponsibility.
The Lord is on the right track, for the social and moral welfare of the American people
As whatever, historical truth, positive truth, that is or scientific, is that dictatorships are independent of the predicates that qualify them.
They can be liberal and progressive, such as Cezar, Danton, and Putin, or despotic and retrograde such as Silas and Robespierre; They can be exercised by great elected humanity, such as Scipio and Trajan, or facinoras like Nero and Hitler.
Thus there is no rational reason to repel dictatorship as long as they are liberal and progressive.
”Writes Pierre Larousse:
The dictator was an extraordinary magistrate, who was created in critics to rule for six months. They called him Latin "dictator," because they all obeyed them to orders.
“Dictator Appellatur, Quod andjus Dicto omnes Audient Essent”.
It was appointed by the Consuls of the Roman Republic by virtue of Senate's ordination.
Bossuet said: "The dictatorship was an extraordinary judiciary, which was instituted according to the requirement, at all times of the Republic and not a particular form of government."
For the above reasons, we found that in ancient Roman society, the dictatorship was not exactly government, but delegation of government, a provisional judiciary (in this case of Russia is not to be provisional), instituted by the organs of the Roman government of the time.
Since this time, the need to concentrate the power to exercise it has been better. So that the later dictatorships that have emerged, more or less modified, have shown that the increasing trend is more pronounced for this concentration. History has shown us that the condemnable part of dictatorships, from the sociological construction of Augusto Comte, only the leaders and directed did not realize, that along with concentration, social evolution also showed the bipartition of power; The separation of temporal and spiritual power, reducing the dictatorship to exert only the first of these powers.
herefore, as long as the principle of separation of powers rigorously respected, dictatorships go from anarchic to progressives, from despotic to liberals, thus becoming true republican dictatorships. Public -public goods.
However, in the common sense of the term, dictator remembers Dépote, dictator remembers tyrant.
The Larousse Encyclopedia clarifies us: it is called dictator, every man who marks the power, or who is accused of sagging him.
When Bonaparte penetrated 18 of Brumine in the board of the five hundred, he was expelled by the deputies of the screams of: "Below the dictator."
Really for the vulgar of the leaders and the directed, there is despotism when the government is exercised by one man, who concentrates in his hands, all power, which exibes not only decrees but also laws. “And also this the same thinking as Montesquieu and Rousseau, the metaphysical writers who inspired the negative phase of the French Revolution through their famous books -“ the spirit of laws “and“ social contract ”as sociology teaches, and before It is simple common sense, is that despotism and tyranny can exist both in the laws of assemblies and in the decrees of individuals. Often most of the time, the assemblies themselves only serve to disguise the despotism of individuals, giving them the false aspect of legitimacy; So it is not in governments so -called democratic, characterized essentially by the bi-partition of power between the legislatures and decree individuals, which is the true republican organization, much less in the so -called undemocratic governments that reduce or eliminate assemblies, concentrating power In the hands of one authority, both spiritual and temporal, as was the case with fascism and Bolshevism. But in the government.
The exclamation of the board of five hundred before Bonaparte should not have been - “Below the dictator!”, But, “Below the tyrant! - Below the despot! ”
The exclamation of all men worthy of being men should have been identical and fully justified before the abominable figures of the Mussolini, the Stalin, “below the tyrants!” - All of these are dictators, but all of the dictators, anti-republican dictators.
The circumstances of these inputs have practiced some good deeds, some republican acts, it is not enough to exclude them from the list of culprits, from the list of reprobes, such as the fact of Caracala, the monstrous Roman emperor, for decreating the memorable act of extending to The whole Roman Empire Roman citizenship, yet does not free it from eternal social condemnation. ”
To legitimize power, they invented popular wisdom, manifested by the election, to replace aristocratic heredity. The electoral process, in force in this democracy - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSmplllLRDWS
But let's be honest, the people will never go to power; And if it is, the chaos will be installed. This is a scam, so Augusto Comte already defined that "the term democracy must be eliminated, as vague, improper and subversive."
But as for the electoral system we know that in order to legitimize power, they invented popular wisdom manifested by direct election to replace aristocratic heredity; We realize that the democratic electoral process is based on four great lies:
First, the votes are equal; both well - intentioned and those of the self -interested, those of those of those of the incompetent;
Of the honest, like those of the dishonest,
of the vagabonds, such as those of the workers,
of the rich, like those of the poor,
of the wise, like those of the idiots,
of the mediocre such as those of scientists,
of theologists such as metaphysics,
of metaphysics such as positives or scientists.
Most are right, when in general, they do not have. If the number of voters is raising the low moral and intellectual level. Let me be sorry, but the truth is that, deep down this democratic election, it is just an illusion, since the people do not choose anyone, at most decide among candidates presented by the most active groups.
The current legitimacy of the government results from the strength that represents society is a collective being, but only acts through its individual organs.
Third is regarding succession, the rule of temporality is illogical.
Administrative continuity allows to improve the exercise of public businesses and removes vulgar and unbridled ambitions. Just establish the maximum and minimum age limits 55 to 85 years, for example. And create a constitution / societal, a Civil Code and a penal code compatible with a municipal labor / capitalist municipal federative constitution policed with free media.
Is it difficult to understand and understand if in the case of entrepreneurs and leaders of religious, cultural and private institutions, these occupants remain in the posts as they have the strength to exercise them, for better efficiency, why do governors have to change periodically? As long as they maintain the order and progress of their nation, there is no need for changes in governance.
Fourth: When the number of voters is increased, the moral and intellectual and cultural level low considerably. It is likely that any day, in the congresses they are crowded with highly selfish mediocre, claiming to be a representative of the majority of the people; Just discussing and nothing acting for the good of this people.
Other defects:
• large amount of money used in advertisements and vote purchases for financing election campaigns; With public and private money, to give nothing to the people, it is not democracy.
• Professional marketers dictating the policies promised by the candidates.
• Electoral fraud as perceived in the penultimate American election, and nov. 2004 in Ukraine.
• Committed govern-ability due to post-election alliances, as is observed today in Brazil. A even by corrupt means. Purchase of votes at Congress.
• Significant percentages of voters, who do not attend to vote, as they are not interested in the outcome of the claims.
In third world countries, a large contingent of illiterate voters, with no parameters for choices, easily influenced by dishonest candidates and electoral cables. Mass media do not educate and most often do not feed the real information so that the illiterate brain can decide for moral conduct.
The current democratic election is just an illusion, since the people, no one chooses, at most decides among candidates, presented by the most active groups, nominated in party assemblies immorally, most of the time; doing with the legality of current governments, results from the strength it represents, For society is a collective being, but only acts through individual bodies.
We who wish to achieve government power to propose to do the good of the people - to be altruistic, that is, "to live for others" we can never reach such a position, because we will not be awarded for $ million, to make our campaigns; even if the party in which we are affiliated legally receive such resources. Because the companies that donate them immorally desire the return of the donated appeal.
What we have to propose is the name we give is an improved democracy, an improvement project to solve the people's problem; by an altruistic, scientifically thinking elite, of high social character, policed by a responsible press and morally dignified justice; For a state organization, which more rigidly disciplines this reigning chaos, where today predominates anarchic progress and a retrograde order. But what is it, to solve the problem of the people, in the material field ($)? It is to reduce the gain range between the rich and the poor. Eliminating the miserable and the millionaire.
Because we know that “only 5% of human beings think new things, 10% think they think, and the remaining 85% hate thinking,” but the latter group loves to repeat ready -made dubious phrases.
This proposed regime, the Republican Societocracy - Politced Capitalist, is much more democratic than this democracy - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSmpllLLRDWS - which today lives in the world - dictatorship of the numbers, causing only, causing only damage. In addition to a budget and management chamber, it has a much more representative congress democratically than today; Let's see, two proposed utopian organs.
Societocracy has its rituals to ensure the non-abuse of authority of the pronouncer and the most moral way of replacing it.
The great Bolivar statesman stated that "a lifetime president with the faculty to appoint his successor, constituted the most sublime inspiration in the republican order."
It is an indication, which will have or not the referendum of an assembly. If not, another is presented. Election by ad-referendum.
US not to implode will have in the medium term that changing their political regime - SOCIETOCRATIC
POLITICAL REGIME: A Country Perplexed with Itsel
No more for the moment I wish you,
Health, with respect and fraternity and
VICTORY!
Paulo Augusto Lacaz https://palacazgrandesartigos.blogspot.com/2023/06/resume.html
https://palacazgrandesartigos.blogspot.com/2023/06/resume.html
